In one post last weekend, I referred to how New Job is providing me “the best (steady) paycheque I ever received.” That, by far, may go down as my greatest understatement of 2006. It’s not that I’m pulling in an obscenely large amount as much as I used to pull in an obscenely small amount before. That said, from what I was able to find from Statistics Canada, even if I don’t factor in my revenue from part-time work, as a single-person household, I now rank well above average. But if you think my social democratic side is feeling guilty about that, think again. After 17 years in the workforce earning well below average, I figure it’s catch-up time. And in fact, given my age, it may already be too late to catch up fully for if/when I reach retirement age, so it’s hard for me to muster up any guilt.
Although I have allowed myself to make some not-completely- indispensible purchases in the last two months, generally I’m in aggressive debt-reduction mode until at least next spring. The day I started New Job, my total debt (minus Junior’s lease) was slightly more than half the gross I’d be earning in the first year at New Job. In two months I’ve sliced one third off that debt, although I project that the remainder, proportionately, will take more than twice as long to eliminate. Given from where I’ve come, combined with a brand of thriftiness that’s quasi-genetic to someone raised by parents with four kids and modest means, what may strike some as austerity measures doesn’t strike me as a great hardship.
As a kid, when schoolmates compared what they got for Christmas, I was convinced my parents had managed to give me the moon, only to find out many of the other kids had gotten the moon and a few planets to boot. That’s how I realized there was a reason why I couldn’t get that 15-cent Slush Puppy every time we went to K-Mart. I suspect that’s how I learned that we don’t always have the luxury of making a choice, and brooding on that inability to make a choice is not going to make that choice more possible. Rather — and if possible — you have to figure out what you can do to set the stage so that one day you could be able to make the choice. So right now I’m in deferral mode, so that by 2008, I could be able to choose to vacation in Provincetown, or Puerto Vallarta, or Palm Springs, or Mykonos……
But these thoughts have brought me to think about the large number of households that earn considerably less than I do now, yet have a couple of rugrats to support. I simply don’t get how they do it! I remember how floored I was went my brother, his wife and three kids at the time came to visit me in Halifax in ’91, and he bought us some pizza for supper. To me it seemed to cost a fortune even back then, and they were on a 10-day or 2-week vacation, meaning this was just one of many meals they had to buy like that. And that’s certainly not the best example. I’m thinking more of today’s single parent who, on average, earns considerably less than I do, yet has to provide food, clothes, shelter and all the other necessities. (Let’s not even get into all the “stuff” that we feel are necessary yet weren’t even part of most households some 30 years ago.) While I know my priorities would be different if I were a single parent, I still think single moms are freakin’ magicians for pulling it off! Or seriously in debt. Or going to bed hungry so their kid(s) won’t.
The only grandparent I got to know, my mother’s father, once declared to us in the ’70s, “Vos enfants et leurs enfants auront d’l'argent plein les poches, mais l’argent ne vaudra plus rien” (“Your kids and their kids will have pocketfuls of money, but that money won’t be worth anything anymore”). Recently, the topic of Rex Murphy’s Cross Country Checkup on CBC Radio was about the rising cost of gas, and a retired economist called in. He had figured out — and was quite surprised at his discovery — that once one adjusts to 1961 dollars and considers the average wages and cost of living back then, the cost of gas and keeping a car on the road was proportionately far LESS then compared to now. Our buying power has eroded in all fields except telecommunications. I’d bet you that today, it wouldn’t take any of us very long to walk into the neighbourhood supermarket and make a comprehensive list of what you can buy for less than $1. That wouldn’t have been as easy to do when I was 10 …and that was only 30 years ago. Off the top of my head, I can only think of Mr. Noodle, macaroni and cheese (if it’s the no-name brand), bottled water (if it’s the store brand), and a can of ordinary tomato soup. Yet if I had been given $5 when I was 10 and let loose in a corner store, I could have done some serious damage.
It’s all very strange, really. Even with less buying power, we still manage to amass more and want more. In my mind, SUVs are the emblem of this consumerist drive gone mad. Even the fact I feel I can’t do without my little Junior although I live in a perfectly walkable city with an adequate transit system is proof that I’ve succumbed like a lot of us have.